Skip to main content

Local Interactive Simulation

Hyperion Inference Control Plane

Explore how queue pressure, workload intent, batching policy, and worker capacity can produce a transparent scheduling recommendation—without presenting simulated values as measured performance.

View GitHub

Serving Policy

Browser-only simulation

Scheduler Decision

Choose a workload shape to inspect Hyperion's illustrative scheduling policy.

No model, GPU, Firebase service, benchmark endpoint, or external API is called.

Validation Boundary

Substantial implementation, unfinished verification.

Hyperion independently implements serving, caching, batching, deployment, and observability concerns. It is locally tested as a reference implementation, not operated as a production inference service.

82Tests passing locally

The current audit also finds 7 failures, primarily in cache integration and batching behavior.

0Published benchmark claims

Latency and throughput depend on hardware, model, runtime, and workload; reproducible results are still future work.

Repository Evidence

Serving

FastAPI endpoints, model lifecycle, CPU fallback, and GPU-aware configuration.

Efficiency

Request batching, response caching, and configurable queue behavior.

Deployment

Docker, Helm, HPA, VPA, and KEDA configuration examples.

Observability

Prometheus, Grafana, tracing, structured logs, and alert definitions.